DeepSeek's official docs now publish an OpenClaw integration flow with re-onboarding, explicit V4 model entry, and dashboard or TUI launch paths

Checked on June 22, 2026: DeepSeek's official OpenClaw page now documents `openclaw onboard --install-daemon`, QuickStart provider selection, manual entry of `deepseek-v4-pro` or `deepseek-v4-flash`, and follow-up launch routes through the dashboard, TUI, or terminal.

Accepted official-source monitoring note

Today's accepted item stays DeepSeek-first and uses a current official DeepSeek documentation page because the official @deepseek_ai X timeline still was not safely readable in this run. DeepSeek's English homepage continues to anchor the official X surface, but the direct timeline did not expose a reliably crawlable current post here, so the publish-safe choice is a first-party docs-backed developer update.

What we verified on June 22, 2026

DeepSeek now has an official OpenClaw integration page inside the agent-integrations section of the API docs.
The migration path is concrete instead of guess-based: existing users are told to run openclaw onboard --install-daemon to re-enter setup and switch the provider to DeepSeek.
DeepSeek's prompt flow is unusually specific: confirm the personal-by-default warning, choose QuickStart, select DeepSeek as the provider, paste a DeepSeek API key, and then manually enter deepseek-v4-pro or deepseek-v4-flash as the default model.
The same page keeps the operational launch routes explicit: users can continue from openclaw dashboard, openclaw tui, or openclaw terminal after setup.
DeepSeek also frames OpenClaw as a message-connected agent surface with Feishu and WeChat support plus Skills, which makes it broader than a terminal-only coding wrapper.

Why this is publishable

This is a current official DeepSeek support page, not a rumor, social repost, or inventory change.

It adds a first-party OpenClaw setup contract that is concrete enough for support-query traffic.
It gives users reproducible setup details they actually search for: the re-onboarding command, the prompt sequence, explicit V4 model entry, and the available launch surfaces after configuration.
It is not a duplicate of the earlier Claude Code, Copilot, Copilot CLI, Hermes, Deep Code, OpenCode, Pi, WorkBuddy, Kilo Code, Oh My Pi, AstrBot, Langcli, or Reasonix items already published on the site.

Why this matters for DeepSeek-first SEO pages

Support pages can now target official OpenClaw + DeepSeek onboarding instead of community-only walkthroughs.
DeepSeek channel-deployment content can cover Feishu and WeChat agent routing without pretending the site sells unrelated model inventory.
The docs give a clearer path for users comparing personal assistant style agents with terminal-only DeepSeek coding tools.

Rejected candidates today

Official X timeline as the primary source: rejected for this run because the homepage anchor remained visible but the direct x.com/deepseek_ai timeline still was not safely readable here.
The homepage V4 Preview anchor: official, but older and already covered by existing V4 launch and migration pages.
The Deep Code integration page: official and accepted as a guide opportunity for this run, but weaker as the single news headline because it had already informed earlier setup coverage and did not beat OpenClaw on net-new operator-facing detail.
Status-page uptime alone: official, but weaker than a new docs page that changes how developers configure a real DeepSeek-backed agent surface.
Official GitHub and Hugging Face surfaces: checked as backup official sources, but no newer first-party item was stronger than the OpenClaw page for today's publish-safe slot.

Editorial takeaway

The safest official DeepSeek story today is an OpenClaw integration documentation check: DeepSeek's own docs now publish the re-onboarding command, the exact provider prompt flow, and the launch paths for bringing DeepSeek into a personal agent stack that can extend into chat channels. That is a stronger current developer signal than recycling an older X anchor we still could not fully verify live.