DeepSeek-first model research

AI Model Benchmarks: DeepSeek V4, OpenClaw Rankings, and Model Comparisons

This page summarizes public benchmark signals, cost context, and developer use cases for DeepSeek V4, GPT 5.4, Claude Sonnet 4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Qwen, GLM, MiniMax, and Grok in server-rendered HTML. The interactive Arena, Showcase, and OpenClaw views remain available, but the core explanation, model table, and internal links do not depend on JavaScript execution.

Benchmark coverage is comparison and research context only. It does not mean a model has a purchasable Coding Plan. The pricing page only lists one-off official-connection Coding Plans when real stock exists; benchmark, arena, and model profile pages are not inventory or availability promises.

How to use this page

  • Showcase: compare coding, reasoning, math, and tool-use performance.
  • Arena: test two or three models side-by-side with your own prompt.
  • OpenClaw: review PinchBench rankings for agentic tool use and cost efficiency.
ModelProviderContextBest fitDetails
DeepSeek V4DeepSeek1MCoding · Long Context · Cost-EfficiencyModel profile
Claude Sonnet 4.7Anthropic1MCoding · Agentic · Long ContextModel profile
GPT 5.4OpenAI1MReasoning · Tool Calling · MultimodalModel profile
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle2MReasoning · Multimodal · Long ContextModel profile
MiniMax M2.7MiniMax205KAgentic · Coding · Long Context · Cost-EfficiencyModel profile
Grok 4.2xAI256KReasoning · Real-Time Data · ScaleModel profile
Qwen 3.5Alibaba1MMultilingual · Reasoning · Open Source · Cost-EfficiencyModel profile
GLM 5Zhipu AI200KCoding · Agentic · Multilingual · Cost-EfficiencyModel profile
🦀

OpenClaw / PinchBench Leaderboard

PinchBench is an independent benchmark suite that evaluates LLM capabilities in tool use, function calling, and agentic reasoning. Unlike static Q&A benchmarks, PinchBench tests how well models interact with external tools and APIs — the exact capabilities needed for building production AI agents and automation workflows.

View on GitHub

Official PinchBench Results

Success rate by model — source: PinchBench authors

PinchBench leaderboard showing Qwen, DeepSeek, Claude, and GPT model rankings

Leaderboard Rankings

Best and average success rates across all PinchBench test categories

RankModelProviderBest ScorePerformance
1
Qwen 3.5Available
Alibaba79.5%
2
DeepSeek V4Available
DeepSeek79.1%
3
Claude Sonnet 4.7Available
Anthropic76.5%
4
GPT 5.4Available
OpenAI76.1%
5
GLM 5Available
Zhipu AI75.7%
6
MiniMax M2.7Available
MiniMax75.7%
7
Nemotron-3 Super 120BAvailable
NVIDIA75.3%
8
Claude Opus 4.2
Anthropic75%
9
MiniMax M2.5Available
MiniMax74.8%
10
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic74.5%
11
GLM-4.5 AirAvailable
Zhipu AI74.1%
12
DeepSeek V4 LiteAvailable
DeepSeek73.8%
13
GPT 5.4 Mini
OpenAI73.5%
14
Qwen 3.5 TurboAvailable
Alibaba73.2%

Tool Use & Function Calling

PinchBench evaluates how well models handle structured tool calls, function invocations, and API interactions — core capabilities for building AI agents.

Multi-Step Reasoning

Tests include chained reasoning tasks where models must plan, execute, and verify tool calls across multiple steps — simulating real agentic workflows.

Reliability Under Pressure

Measures success rates across hundreds of edge cases including malformed inputs, ambiguous instructions, and complex parameter combinations.

Cost-Performance Sweet Spot

DeepSeek V4 ranks in the top tier with strong cost-performance versus Claude/GPT pricing — making it an excellent choice for high-volume agentic workloads.

Best-Value Models · Deep Discounts

Get Discounted Official API Keys for PinchBench Top Performers

The top-ranking cost-effective models on PinchBench are available here at deeply discounted prices. Qwen (#1), DeepSeek (#2), and more — all official API keys, direct from the providers. Perfect for OpenClaw-style agentic workflows, tool use, and function calling at scale.

Qwen 3.5#1 (79.5%)DeepSeek V4V4#2 (79.1%)Claude Sonnet 4.7#3 (76.5%)GPT 5.4#4 (76.1%)GLM 5#5 (75.7%)MiniMax M2.7#6 (75.7%)Nemotron-3 Super 120B#7 (75.3%)MiniMax M2.5#9 (74.8%)GLM-4.5 Air#11 (74.1%)DeepSeek V4 LiteV4#12 (73.8%)Qwen 3.5 Turbo#14 (73.2%)